![]() ![]() Horzempa believes we are ready for 0.1 micro-arcsecond (μas), or 100 nano-arcseconds (nas) astrometry, a level anticipated for NASA’s canceled Space Interferometry Mission, and one for which hardware had already been constructed. You can see from this the precision needed for space-based astrometry. ![]() A milliarcsecond, then, is one-thousandth of an arcsecond, and a microarcsecond is one millionth of an arcsecond. A circle of 360 degrees can be divided up into arcminutes and then arcseconds (1/60th of an arcminute). Recall that minutes of arc are used to describe small angles. What is significant here is that an era of astrometry 50 to 100 times more precise than Gaia may be at hand. ESA’s Gaia mission, through its unprecedented all-sky survey of the position, brightness and motion of over one billion stars, is generating a large dataset from which exoplanets will be found, either through observed changes in a star’s position on the sky due to planets orbiting around it, or by a dip in its brightness as a planet transits its face. This technique can also be used to identify planets around a star by measuring tiny changes in the star’s position as it wobbles around the center of mass of the planetary system. Image: Astrometry is the method that detects the motion of a star by making precise measurements of its position on the sky. For more on this, see Kervella et al., “Stellar and Substellar Companions of Nearby Stars from Gaia DR2,” Astronomy & Astrophysics Volume 623, A72 (March 2019). Gaia also found evidence for a possible gas giant around Epsilon Indi. Thus the mission’s detections of velocity anomalies at Barnard’s Star, Tau Ceti and Ross 128. The Gaia mission makes the case that astrometry is already in play in the exoplanet hunt. Instrumentation-induced errors unfortunately made these detections unlikely.īut astrometry has major advantages if we can reach the necessary accuracy, which is Horzempa’s point. Kaj Strand, likewise working at Sproul Observatory at Swarthmore, thought he had detected a planet orbiting 61 Cygni all the way back in 1943. ![]() Long-time Centauri Dreams readers will recall Peter Van de Kamp’s work at Swarthmore on what he believed to be a planet detection around Barnard’s Star, but we can also mention Sarah Lippincott’s efforts at the same observatory on Lalande 21185. The problem has always been the level of precision needed to detect such minute variations. But radial velocity examines Doppler effects in a star’s spectrum as the star moves toward and then away from us, while astrometry looks for tiny changes in the position of the star in the sky, especially the kind of periodic shift that implies an otherwise unseen planet. When I talk to people about detecting exoplanets, I find that many confuse astrometry with radial velocity, for in loose explanatory terminology, both refer to measuring the ‘wobble’ a planet induces on a star. I’m homing in on astrometry itself in this post rather than the mission concept, for the technique may be coming into its own as an exoplanet detection method, and I’m interested in new ways to exploit it.Īstrometry is all about refining our measurement of a star’s position in the sky. In a white paper submitted to the Decadal Survey on Astronomy and Astrophysics ( Astro2020), Philip Horzempa (LeMoyne College) suggests using technology originally developed for the NASA Space Interferometry Mission (SIM), along with subsequent advances, in a mission designed to exploit astrometry as an exoplanet detection mode. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |